Fine cotton business paper: $11 Inkjet printer: $35 1940 Royal Model KMM manual typewriter: $10 2 Shilling coin: $1 Pilot Varsity fountain pen: $3 Punkin' the Birthers: Priceless tags: hoax, punk, punk'd, fake obama birth certificate, kenyan birth certificate, kenya birth certificate, birthers  

130 responses to Birthers Punk'd! Hoax Kenyan Birth Certificate

  1. Poor birthers.  Another crazy theory bites the dust.  Oh, but wait.  They'll spend the next several days proving that these photos are a hoax.  Just too hard to let go of their fantasy.

    • Just a thought...while the Birthers are indeed a wacky sort of conspiracist, there are many conspiracy theories that aren't crazy...;)

       Nice hoax guys...I was waiting for the shoe to drop.

      Sound off on Hawiian Democrat authoring bill to force Obama to show birth certificate?

      Read Related Story

      << Return to main polls page

      Sound off on Hawaiian Democrat authoring bill to force Obama to show birth certificate? (114 votes)

      I guess even a Democrat lawmaker is curious why Obama would spend over a million dollars to not produce a $15 copy of a document66% (75)
      Tell me again exactly what's wrong with demanding the president show his birth certificate8% (9)
      The only difference between him and the other legislators is he has the courage to ask the obvious7% (8)
      The rats are abandoning ship7% (8)
      Here's a Democrat I could support4% (5)
      I'm suspicious - a Democrat keeping alive a whacky conspiracy that's dividing Republicans3% (3)
      This is a setup to have the state forced to release a document so Obama doesn't have to lose face and do it himself3% (3)
      I hope this works - we need to find a way to get past this issue so we can address other more important issues2% (2)
      Other1% (1)
      Clearly, he's angling for early retirement0% (0)
      He's definitely a man who's not playing with a full deck0% (0)
      He's probably being paid by the GOP attack machine0% (0)
      He's probably just another right-wing lunatic0% (0)
      I don't agree with him but he's clearly got integrity0% (0)
      There are traitors within every constituency0% (0)
      What nonsense - Obama's campaign posted his birth certificate on the Internet over a year ago0% (0)
      • First of all, no evidence that Obama has spent millions - or, really, anything - fighting these flaky lawsuits.  The lawyers who have appeared were associated with the Obama campaign last year and it appears they are doing this work as a freebee.  So far those lawyers have had to do nearly nothing, inasmuch as the judges kick those cases out without waiting for them to respond.

        Second, mentioned in another person's entry, Alan Keyes doesn't have standing any more than any of the other purported plaintiffs.  Even winning this lawsuit wouldn't help Keyes -- he lost the election so thoroughly you'd think Charles Manson was his running mate.

        Obama HAS SHOWN US his birth certificate.  It's that page of green safety paper his office made public last year.  According to the Hawaii Health Dept, it is the ONE AND ONLY birth document presently being issued for ANYONE born in Hawaii.  It states very clearly that Obama was born in Honolulu, and that his birth was registered with Hawaii Health Dept within two business days (and two Honolulu newspapers reported the birth within a week of that registration).  THe certificate is on the official form and it has the official impression seal.  THe director of the Hawaii Health Dept and the (Republican) Governor have both gone public to attest that this document made public by Obama is the genuine article.  Hawaiian laws, cited at the bottom of that form, make it clear that document is the legal equivalent of any other birth document.  The Hawaii Health Dept says that no other (older, more detailed) birth document will be issued - for anyone - except by court order.

        Now, if you're looking for a President who wouldn't let people see his birth certificate, there's Ronald Reagan.  Old Ron wouldn't let anyone see his b/c because he was actually afraid that, knowing the exact date and time of his birth, the Commies would draw up his horoscope.  Fancy Nancy wouldn't let anyone see hers either - because she had been fudging her age by a few years ever since her Hollywood days.



    • Why doesn't Barry Soetoro show his real birth certificate then, asshole? His real name is Barry Soetoro or didnt you know that, dum-dum? He never legally changed his name to Barack Obama. He is a fraud. He will not show his real birth certificate because that would show he was born in Kenya. If you can show me Soetoro's long version certified Hawaiian birth certificate then you win. But you can't. That's because Soetoro won't release it and he can't release something that doesn't exist.
      • His real name is Barack Obama. He doesn't need to change his name to his name, dum-dum.


        And nope. You win if you can show a real Kenyan BC for him. Otherwise you lose. But you can't. That's because it doesn't exist. So you lose.

      • Pretty funny. It must be difficult being you. Get yourself to a therapist. There are good drugs these days for the paranoid and deluded. 

      • So let me get this straight: You contend that Barak Hussein Obama (His real, original name, by the way, as has been clearly established by every legal authority ever to review the matter) was born in Kenya to an Indonesian father named Soetoro. And your proof of this is that there is no record on file in Hawaii of the birth of a boy named Barry Soetoro. And you believe that for some reason this Barry Soetoro decided to try to fool the world into believing he was an American by claiming that his father was Kenyan?

        It's OK. Try to get plenty of sleep, and eat a healthy diet. Soon our president, Barak Hussein Obama(a natural-born American from Hawaii) will help establish decent health care for America, and I'm sure your underlying condition can be addressed.

        • yeah. that's conservative logic. no one can prove godallahbuddhafsmsantaclaus exists, therefore godallahbuddhafsmsantaclaus must exist.
          elsewhere recently, i saw a birther claim that "barry" must be british and indonesian and kenyan, while also stating that (at least one of those countries) doesn't allow for dual-citizenship. hmm, more conservative logic.
          (i know this is an old thread, but the oily crew is in the news. now they've gotta pay the price of her frivolous-lawsuit-3-seconds-of-fame. i wonder if instead they'll try filing chap7?)

          i wonder why the birthers have refudiated to produce obama's many non-hawaiian birth certificates?
      • 1) His name is legally Barack Hussein Obama II

        2) He released his legal birth certificate from Hawaii.

        3) There is no "secret long version."  That's the document.  It's out.

        4) You are a delusional tool.  Give it up and go back to your home planet, doofus.

    • Birthers?????

      Try employers, Barry is on the clock with our nickel.

      I want to check the credentials of my employee.

      Seeing that part of that employee's job description includes finger on the BIG REDnuclear button.

    • Hmmm. Since When Does An "anonymous blogger who says it (Obama's Apparent Kenyan Birth Certificate) is a fake" MAKE It A Fake?

      Well, I Absolutely Know For A FACT That Mr. Obama IS A FAKE "Natural Born U.S. Citizen": Because He Has NOT, To This VERY Date, Released His ORIGINAL Birth & Education Records For Public, National & World-Wide AUTHENTICATION & VERIFICATION !






      • The courts decided it was an obvious forgery, not this blogger.  This blogger is taking credit and whether or not she/he did the forgery doesn't change the that the Taitz submitted it as 'proof' to a court...

        A court which quickly determined it to be a forgery and fined her $20,000 for filing frivolous lawsuits over this issue.  Even Taitz's former client has repudiated her.

        The Supreme Court upheld the fine.  


        So, press your Cap Lock key once, keep it that way, and get back on your meds.  Your doctor never said you could get off them.  


      Will Oorah's Fiveish produce his birth certificate  

  2. Wow.  Just wow.  Obots are so stupid and/or desperate that they're actually helping the Birthers prove just how easy it is for anyone to forge a birth certificate - including Obama of course.

    Wow.  Just wow.  Keep up the good work there.

    • Ha ha.  Calling the hoax a forgery is like calling monopoly money a forgery.  It's so obviously a fake that only a fool would believe it to be real.
    • Wow, I never thought of that!  And I'm sure it's equally easy to get the State of Hawaii and the US government (that issues security clearances and passports) to be fooled the forgery!  You're right, you are too smart for us.  We are foiled!
    • It's a lot like the "fake" documents that ended up costing Dan Rather his job. Give someone a fake document that confirms their beliefs then show it to be a fake. The argument then becomes about the faked document rather than the questions originally posed.



    • you're kind of a dingus, aren't you

      then again birthers would need physical verification of obama coming out of his mom's baby canal in a field of hisbiscuses that spelled out the word "hawaii" - wait, no, they still wouldn't believe that because they are bonkers.

      • it's odd that a site would not want any identifiabl info, oh thats right it's a liberal blog, but the only question is why not show his birth certifcate and school records, we all need to, what makes him special, other than he hood- winked the country into voting for an empty suit left wing socialest at the least president
        • Do you know about spellcheck? Obama won the election fairly. If there was anything suspicious about Obama's citizenship, Hillary Clinton would have brought it to light over a year ago. You are embarrassing yourself by continuing to talk about it.

          1 comments not shown ([view all])

        • Oh dear.  It's an *anonymous* site, not a liberal one.  The blogger chose this site for his/her confession because forgery is a crime.  She/he enjoyed punking Orly Taitz so much she/he couldn't hold it in.  Perfectly human response.


          So now, calm down and take your meds.  Your doctor never said you could get off them.

    • While it may be "easy" for Mr. Obama to forge a birth certificate, there exists no evidence that he has done so.
    • Yawn.............................................................................................
  3. Punked what?

    So you got a inkjet printer?

    Big deal.

  4. Brilliant!  Three threads, one over 7000 posts long, of freepers navel gazing over this.  They go so hot and bothered they even started banning their own long-time members!  

     Reveal yourself - at least give a pseudonym - so the wikipedia page can propery immortalize you.  You are a master!



  5. OMG, just when I thought it couldn't get any better... Even when presented with irrefutable proof that they have been played, the typical freeper has an infinite resevoir of denial:

    Damn you’re gullible! (or part of the deception, which is it?)

    The coin thing was disproven Sunday - old hat.

    Lots of people have typewriters and quilts, and some even have cameras!

    M O R O N !

    7,435 posted on Thu 06 Aug 2009 11:56:04 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)


    • "Believe me, I am a fraud"  is what we are being basically told.

      Why should we trust anyone who presents himself as a forger?

      And who would have an interest in muddling the issue  of where the Fraudster-in-Chief was born but HIMSELF and his accomplices?

      Let's SEE the Honolulu birth certificate, which he has spent thousands  trying to keep from the eyes of WE THE PEOPLE,  and until then,  let the speculation  as to WHAT he is UNDOUBTEDLY HIDING  lay where it belongs:  at HIS feet.


      • <i>

        Let's SEE the Honolulu birth certificate,

        It's right here:

        You know, he's under no obligation to send it to you personally.  Or to Orly the psycho.

        which he has spent thousands  trying to keep from the eyes of WE THE PEOPLE,

        Yes all of that effort to hide it, well other than the whole post it on the Internet for anybody to see thing. 

          and until then,  let the speculation  as to WHAT he is UNDOUBTEDLY HIDING  lay where it belongs:  at HIS feet.

        I lay it at the feet of nutjobs that just can't accept the fact the we elected him.  Deal with it.

        • sorry but that isn't the long form birth certificate. wouldn't get ya into little league.

          4 comments not shown ([view all])

        • are liars. They know pretty well the difference between  a certification, a computer printout and the original certificate.

          The reason why the certification proves nothing as to where  the Chief Fraudster was born has been published many times. 

          Hers it is again:

          Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigator’s June 10 Report

          ... Let’s begin with the statement that Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health released on October 31, 2008. The television and print media used this statement as a reason to prevent and treat with contempt any investigation into whether Barack Obama was not born in Hawaii.
          But the language of the statement was so carefully hedged and guarded that it should have had the opposite effect.

          “There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth certificate. State law (Hawai‘i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record. Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

          It is understandable that after such an apparently definitive statement most news outlets, whether conservative or liberal, would accept this as sufficient grounds to relegate the controversy to the status of a fringe phenomenon.
          Unless they happened to take the trouble to look into the “state policies and procedures” as laid down by the relevant statutes.
          If they had done so, they would have seen that Dr. Fukino’s press release was carefully hedged and “lawyered” and practically worthless.
          But the media in general should not be faulted. The statement seems to roll out with such bureaucratic certainty and final authority. I believed it to be significant until a Honolulu attorney mailed me the relevant statutes. I was so surprised that I laughed out loud.

          Here is a summary of Hawaii’s “state policies and procedures” in 1961.

          In the State of Hawaii, back in 1961, there were four different ways to get an “original birth certificate” on record. They varied greatly in their reliability as evidence.

          For convenience, I’ll call them BC1, BC2, BC3, and BC4.

          -- BC1. If the birth was attended by a physician or mid wife, the attending medical professional was required to certify to the Department of Health the facts of the birth date, location, parents’ identities and other information. (See Section 57-8 & 9 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).

          -- BC2. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then all that was required was that one of the parents send in a birth certificate to be filed. The birth certificate could be filed by mail. There appears to have been no requirement for the parent to actually physically appear before “the local registrar of the district.” It would have been very easy for a relative to forge an absent parent’s signature to a form and mail it in. In addition, if a claim was made that

          “neither parent of the newborn child whose birth is unattended as above provided is able to prepare a birth certificate, the local registrar shall secure the necessary information from any person having knowledge of the birth and prepare and file the certificate.” (Section 57-8&9)

          I asked the Dept of Health what they currently ask for (in 2008) to back up a parent’s claim that a child was born in Hawaii. I was told that all they required was a proof of residence in Hawaii (e.g. a driver’s license [We know from interviews with her friends on Mercer Island in Washington State that Ann Dunham had acquired a driver’s license by the summer of 1961 at the age of 17] or telephone bill) and pre-natal (statement or report that a woman was pregnant) and post-natal (statement or report that a new-born baby has been examined) certification by a physician.
          On further enquiry, the employee that I spoke to informed me that the pre-natal and post-natal certifications had probably not been in force in the ‘60s. Even if they had been, there is and was no requirement for a physician or midwife to witness, state or report that the baby was born in Hawaii.

          -- BC3. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, a “Delayed Certificate” could be filed, which required that “a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing or the alteration [of a file] shall be endorsed on the certificates”, which “evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.” The statute provided that “the probative value of a ‘delayed’ or ‘altered’ certificate shall be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence.” (See Section 57- 9, 18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).”

          [In other words, this form of vault birth certificate, the Delayed Certificate, required no more than a statement before a government bureaucrat by one of the parents or (the law does not seem to me clear on this) one of Barack Obama’s grandparents. If the latter is true, Ann Dunham did not have to be present for this statement or even in the country.]

          -- BC4. If a child is born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult (including the subject person [i.e. the birth child as an adult]) if the Office of the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year. (See Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961.) In 1955 the “secretary of the Territory” was in charge of this procedure. In 1960 it was transferred to the Office of the Lieutenant Governor (“the lieutenant governor, or his secretary, or such other person as he may designate or appoint from his office” §338-41 [in 1961]).

          In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fifth kind of “original birth certificate”. Under Act 182 H.B. NO. 3016-82,

          “Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that the proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.”

          In this way “state policies and procedures” accommodate even “children born out of State” (this is the actual language of Act 182) with an “original birth certificate on record.” So it is even possible that the birth certificate referred to by Dr Fukino is of the kind specified in Act 182. This possibility cannot be dismissed because such a certificate certainly satisfies Dr Fukino’s statement that

          “I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

          If this is the case, Dr Fukino would have perpetrated so unusually disgusting a deception that I find it practically incredible (and I greatly doubt that anyone could be that shameless [well, Obama IS that shameless]). On the other hand, if the original birth certificate is of types 2, 3, or 4, Dr Fukino’s statement would be only somewhat less deceptive and verbally tricky. I only bring up this possibility to show how cleverly hedged and “lawyered” and basically worthless Dr Fukino’s statement is.

          Sections 57-8, 9, 18, 19, 20 & 40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act explain why Barack Obama has refused to release the original vault birth certificate.

          If the original certificate were the standard BC1 type of birth certificate, he would have allowed its release and brought the controversy to a quick end.

          But if the original certificate is of the other kinds, then Obama would have a very good reason not to release the vault birth certificate. For if he did, then the tape recording of Obama’s Kenyan grandmother asserting that she was present at his birth in Kenya becomes far more important. As does the Kenyan ambassador’s assertion that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, as well as the sealing of all government and hospital records relevant to Obama by the Kenyan government. And the fact that though there are many witnesses to Ann Dunham’s presence on Oahu from Sept 1960 to Feb 1961, there are no witnesses to her being on Oahu from March 1961 to August 1962 when she returned from Seattle and the University of Washington. No Hawaiian physicians, nurses, or midwives have come forward with any recollection of Barack Obama’s birth.

          The fact that Obama refuses to release the vault birth certificate that would instantly clear up this matter almost certainly indicates that the vault birth certificate is probably a BC2 or possibly a BC3.


          2 comments not shown ([view all])

      • excellent!!
    • Many "birthers" have invested a significant level of trust in the reliability of claims that would challenge Mr. Obama's legal status as the President of the United States; some of them may have even contributed financially to efforts intended to "expose" Mr. Obama as not being a "natural born" United States citizen.  As individuals invest -- whether emotionally, financially, or both -- into a claim, they become increasingly unwiling to consider that their investment has been for naught, and thus they will become increasingly irrational in defending the value of their investment in spite of evidence suggesting its invalidity.
      • That's exactly right! Just like all the liberals who swooned over osama bin bama and just can't accept that he's absolutely the worst thing that could have ever happened to this country. But the Right has learned from the Left - be loud, be obnoxious, throw out lots of allegations, point out conspiracies, question authority, ... what else ... oh yea, and never give up!!  
  6. Only blithering idiots ever thought this was real. Everybody knows Birthers are idiots. The entire world knows that Orly Taitz is an idiot, and clearly completely insane. The entire universe knows that Freepers are idiots, and hate America. Only dangerously gullible idiots would be right-wingers. Idiots one and all.
    • ad hominem- try coming up with a rational argument next time- unless you want to call me names and prove my point again.
    • The issue goes far beyond Obama's birth certificate.  It's all the other records he has refused to release.  Never in our history has a president of the United States been less transparent than this one.  I'm willing to concede that he was born in the Hawaii, but if so, what is he hiding when he refuses tio release his school and college records? Only an idiot left winger could attempt to cover for him on that score.  It's because they, like Obama, are afraid of what they might reveal.  Of course, we know he's a marxist at heart, proof positive that he's an idiot.


      For those interested in a scholarly analysis of the workings of brain-dead leftists/liberals/progressives, marxists/socialists/Trotskyites, I recommenmd The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness by Lyle Rossiter , Jr., M.D.   

    • Only blithering idiots write posts like yours.

      "Everybody knows..." ---- you obviously know everybody

      ..."  --- (sigh)

      You obviously still haven't figured out that the left/right paradigm is false.

      Foolish person.

  7. Thousands of Americans who still believe your fake document even better. 
  8. dude, you fucking rock! i hope you help get that batshit orly dis-barred from her online law degree. hey you racist freepers, go pound some kenyan sand!



  9. Pimpin for a President who has told 158+ DOCUMENTED LIES.  How cool is that?
    • it's WAY cooler than starting two unnecessary wars of aggression, and causing the deaths of thousands.
      • Yeah,  liberating Muslims from dictators like Saddam or the Taliban and giving them a chance at real freedom like an asshole like you enjoys is so hard to appreciate. 
        • hey asshole, maybe if we didn't go around propping up dictators like saddam (and selling him WMD's in the first place) and the taliban (hey, they hated the commies, so we loved 'em, now they fucking hate us, oops!) we wouldn't have to bomb the fuck out of women and children. go pound some kenyan sand in your bleeding ass, you neo-con war monger.


          enjoying the obamanation so far ? hope not. i hope you're shitting in your lil panties, you gun clinging moron. go jack off to some pictures of sarah ' the quitter' palin.

          2 comments not shown ([view all])

      • red herring. 
      • Um..what about if the lies told enable the perpetuation of above mentioned wars and the continued deaths of thousands ??

        Which of course THEY DO !!!

        From a non-usa perspective, I think time will show your current govt. to be an even more corrupt and evil bunch than the previous govt and its previous govt and its previous infinitum




    • Dunno about the documented lies, but it's pretty cool that he's the President. Glad you finally came around and acknowledged it. :)
  10. From a conservative: brilliant work.

     (I'll give credit where credit is due)

    • Make that a Democrat for 56 years until this last election when the bottom of the Democrat barrel rose to the top and reared it's ugly, sexist, demented and as you exhibited yourself, deceptive head.  Will never ever vote for a Democrat again as long as I live.  The party of Scoop Jackson is dead!  Your gloating for what you did is an example of how low the party's values have sunk.  Only stupid people find your exploit mentionable.  Since your the one tooting your horn that makes you stupid too.  But hey, look on the bright side, stupid people don't know they are stupid. Guess you can live with yourself and rationalize your behavior for a long time to come.
      • hey stupid, your brain dead fingers typed the following :


         since you've taken the time to post on here several times, i guess

        you consider yourself stupid too ? what a fucking maroon.

        ya know how to keep a fucking neo-con wingnut in suspense ? i'll tell ya tomorrow.


        • NEWSFLASH!!!!  I THINK THE MORON HERE IS THE ONE WHO SPELLS THE WORD AS MAROON.  Such vitriol too!  More evidence the Democratic Party has lost it's morals to people who are dead inside and don't know it. 

          2 comments not shown ([view all])

  11. Soooooo Sweeeet!





  12. Someone is really stupid.  I wonder if it'll be as funny when they're sitting in jail?





    § 1028. Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information

    (a) Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection (c) of this section

    (1) knowingly and without lawful authority produces an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document;

    (2) knowingly transfers an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document knowing that such document or feature was stolen or produced without lawful authority;

    * * * shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of this section.

    (b) The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) of this section is—

    (1) except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 15 years, or both, if the offense is—

    (A) the production or transfer of an identification document, authentication feature, or false identification document that is or appears to be—

    (i) an identification document or authentication feature issued by or under the authority of the United States; or

    (ii) a birth certificate, or a driver’s license or personal identification card;

    * * *

    (c) The circumstance referred to in subsection (a) of this section is that—

    * * *

    (3) either—

    (A) the production, transfer, possession, or use prohibited by this section is in or affects interstate or foreign commerce, including the transfer of a document by electronic means; or

    (B) the means of identification, identification document, false identification document, or document-making implement is transported in the mail in the course of the production, transfer, possession, or use prohibited by this section.

    (d) In this section and section 1028A—

    (1) the term “authentication feature” means any hologram, watermark, certification, symbol, code, image, sequence of numbers or letters, or other feature that either individually or in combination with another feature is used by the issuing authority on an identification document, document-making implement, or means of identification to determine if the document is counterfeit, altered, or otherwise falsified;

    (2) the term “document-making implement” means any implement, impression, template, computer file, computer disc, electronic device, or computer hardware or software, that is specifically configured or primarily used for making an identification document, a false identification document, or another document-making implement;

    (3) the term “identification document” means a document made or issued by or under the authority of the United States Government, a State, political subdivision of a State, a sponsoring entity of an event designated as a special event of national significance, a foreign government, political subdivision of a foreign government, an international governmental or an international quasi-governmental organization which, when completed with information concerning a particular individual, is of a type intended or commonly accepted for the purpose of identification of individuals;

    (4) the term “false identification document” means a document of a type intended or commonly accepted for the purposes of identification of individuals that—

    (A) is not issued by or under the authority of a governmental entity or was issued under the authority of a governmental entity but was subsequently altered for purposes of deceit; and

    (B) appears to be issued by or under the authority of the United States Government, a State, a political subdivision of a State, a sponsoring entity of an event designated by the President as a special event of national significance, a foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, or an international governmental or quasi-governmental organization;

    * * *

    (6) the term “issuing authority”—

    (A) means any governmental entity or agency that is authorized to issue identification documents, means of identification, or authentication features; and

    (B) includes the United States Government, a State, a political subdivision of a State, a sponsoring entity of an event designated by the President as a special event of national significance, a foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, or an international government or quasi-governmental organization;

    * * *

    (f) Attempt and Conspiracy.— Any person who attempts or conspires to commit any offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the attempt or conspiracy.


    • And don't think they won't find prosecute him.
    • Oh shit guys, he just copyasta'd laws at us!  We're doomed!

      I'm sorry you feel so butthurt over your movement being fooled by some random asshole on the internet.  Oh, wait, I'm not sorry.

      What's your next trick?  Threatening to beat people with your totally awesome Jeet-Kun-Do internet toughguy skills?  Maybe talk about a slander case? 

    • It is illegal to counterfit an official document. Excellent research, devoid of empirical reasoning. The hoax is not and was never meant to be a copy of a real document. Any more than a Mickey Mouse club ID that has "driver's license" hand written across it and is posted on the internet. If somebody applied for a passport or other commerce (job, etc) that would be fraud. Generating this fake document, associated with no country and no real document is no crime. It is the same as a very humorous "Certificate of Appreciation" that I print all the time.
    • YAWN!


      This does not apply. Fair Use protects such practices when enacted for artistic purposes - such as fooling gullible idiots - or commentary.


      Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

      1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
      2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
      3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
      4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

      The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.


      Watching an episode of Nightcourt doesn't make you a fucking lawyer.  

  13. I can't accept this as proof of the hoax -- I need to see the long form forgery, goddammit.
      Bill would force Obama to reveal birth documents
      State senator: 'Why wouldn't they be available to the public?'

      Posted: August 07, 2009
      12:30 am Eastern

      By Jerome R. Corsi
      © 2009 WorldNetDaily


      Hawaii state Sen. Will Espero

      Hawaii state Sen. Will Espero, a Democrat, has confirmed plans to introduce legislation through which the state's lawmakers would force the public disclosure of all President Obama's birth documents held by the Hawaii Department of Health, including President Obama’s long-form original birth certificate.

      Espero told WND his bill is aimed at "giving citizens access to birth records" under a standard of government transparency which would permit journalists to request in writing the public disclosure of vital birth records including long-form birth certificates of all persons born in Hawaii. He said it would include the release of birth records on those previously born in Hawaii.

      "My decision to file the legislation was primarily a result of the fuss over President Obama's birth records and the lingering questions," Espero said.

      Espero told WND that he believes President Obama was born in Hawaii.

      (Story continues below)


      "My motivation is strictly to promote transparency," he said. "When I found out that Hawaii birth records were not available to the public my first thought was, 'Why wouldn't they be available to the public?'

      "As far as I am concerned, records regarding whether a person was born here or not should be in the public domain," he said.

      Asked specifically about Obama's birth records, including the original long-form birth certificate, Espero said, "Whatever birth records regarding President Obama that the Hawaii Department has on file should be made public."

      Espero emphasized that his legislation would make provisions to deal with security issues by making sure no information would be released that could aid criminals to commit identity theft.

      Once his legislation is drafted, Espero said he would submit it to Hawaii Director of Health Dr. Chiyome Fukino for comment before introducing the legislation to the Hawaii state legislature.

      WND previously reported that the Hawaii Department of Health destroyed no paper long-form original birth certificate records when the agency moved to electronic record keeping in 2001.

      Get the eligibility movie that debuted on Obama's birthday! It's the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential mystery!


      "I am not aware of any birth certificate records that have been destroyed by the department," Janice Okubo, Public Information Officer for the Hawaii DOH, told WND.

      "When the department went electronic in 2001, vital records whether in paper form or any other form have been maintained. We don't destroy records," she said.

      Okubo affirmed that beginning in 2001, all vital records including birth records moved to electronic formats.

      "Any records that we had in paper or any other form before 2001 are still in file within the department," she insisted. "We have not destroyed any vital statistics records that we have."

      WND has also reported the Hawaiian Department of Health declined to authenticate either of the two versions of President Obama's short-form "Certification of Live Birth," posted online – one image produced by the Obama campaign and the other produced by

      Okubu also had no explanation for why Dr. Chiyome Fukino's initial press release in her position as chief of the health department last October and subsequent press release on July 27 avoided declaring the posted images to be authentic documents.
      • Prepare to eat some humble pie if this legislation passes, Probamas.

        -You might want to remove your foot first. 

    • -- Given the state of the jurisprudence on "natural born citizenship ", the Gray Communist Usurper would most probably be found ineligible by any serious U.S. court even if he were born in the United States
      This is evident from the quotations in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) and even more from the discussions leading to the passing of the 14th Amendment -- if only a court would accept to address the issue rather than claim incompetence or deny standing:

      ... Whatever might had been the correct understanding of “natural-born citizen” prior to 1866, the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment certainly changes the view because for the first time we have a written national rule declaring who are citizens through birth or naturalization. Who may be born citizens is conditional upon being born “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States - a condition not required under the common law. The legislative definition of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” was defined as “Not owing allegiance to anybody else.”

      This national rule prevents us from interpreting natural-born citizen under common law rules because it eliminates the possibility of a child being born with more than one allegiance....

      Rep. John A. Bingham commenting on Section 1992 said it means

      “every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”
      (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))

      Bingham subscribed to the same view as most everyone in Congress at the time that in order to be born a citizen of the United States one must be born within the allegiance of the Nation. Bingham had explained that to be born within the allegiance of the United States the parents, or more precisely, the father, must not owe allegiance to some other foreign sovereignty

      ... Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, James F. Wilson of Iowa, added on March 1, 1866:

      “We must depend on the general law relating to subjects and citizens recognized by all nations for a definition, and that must lead us to the conclusion that every person born in the United States is a natural born citizen of such States, except that it may be that children born on our soil to temporary sojourners [British subject Barack Hussein Sr] or representatives of foreign Governments.” [Soviet agent Franklin Marshall Davis]
      (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1117 (1866))

    From FreeRepublic:

         An Obama fanatic follower forged this document...
         MSM do you or anybody get that?
         An Obama fanatic follower forged his Kenyan BC...
         Can someone from the less than credible MSM ask this low life


         Inquiring minds would like to know...

         19 posted on Thu 06 Aug 2009 04:49:49 PM PDT by nikos1121 (praying for -13)

     Why would he do such a thing?!?  Because he likes seeing idiotslike you chase their tails, that's why!

     You are a fucking tool, nikos1121


  15. Unfortunately, you were only sucessful in confirming what they had already suspected for some time:

     Maybe you should have checked your email? 

  16. Nice try but but your fake 2 Shilling coin isn't what is embossed on the Kenyan Birth Certificate! If you look closely to a blow up of the Kenyan Birth Certificate its lettering is bigger and doesn't match your coin impression! The Kenyan one, if you look at the top right I can make out a possible NA, just trying to match that size lettering to the coin you used doesn't work!

    Sorry! And also what you're trying to prove is that you typed up the field entries on your fake certificate! But what source did you photograph the form? The Internet! You failed to explain how you got your fake form to begin with! You photocopied off the Internet, removed the field entries, rephotgraphed your copy of the form (minus the entries which you removed first by your computer), printed the new form on this cotton paper, typed up the entries by a typewriter and pressed a coin on the paper to fake an embossed stamp! Yah--it's alot of work but it's still fake! The one you're trying to prove is fake didn't use a coin but used a genuine stamp--you loose!


      The 2 shilling coin in the photograph is the same coin that I used to create the seal. A fellow over on Free Republic made two very nice animations illustrating this. In his first animation, he uses the first photograph I posted here.

      In his second animation he uses the image that was released by Dr. Taitz.

      You really should pay closer attention to the first photograph I posted here. Many seem to think it's the one that was released by Dr. Taitz. It is not. It is the jpeg version of the tiff file that was downloaded from my camera. It is 2048 x 1536 pixels and was saved with the least amount of jpeg compression. The best photograph released by Dr. Taitz is only 1024 x 768 pixels and is horribly compressed.

      Indeed the first photograph I posted is perhaps the most important of the four. Nothing released by Dr. Taitz is of such high resolution and quality.




      • I'm sure your jailmates will be impressed with your imaginative self.  lol  Trust me they'll find you...not that hard since all computers leave their own little "stamp" on the internet.  ;)

          There is no one to find as there were no US laws violated. A joke Kenyan birth certificate is not, nor appears to be "issued by or under the authority of the United States or a sponsoring entity of an event designated as a special event of national significance."



        • Actually, it  can be very hard, since the little "stamp" you refer to is just an IP address, which can come from anywhere. If I post this through TOR (a globally distributed proxy server) all that's going to show up is some computer in a closet in Norway. If they somehow magically circumvent international law and subpeona the IP records from that computer, they'll see another one in Taiwan, and so on.

          You birthers are like retarded children. You know, the ones they let stand in the outfield during little league, no matter which team is on the field? The ones that keep running around the bases when everyone is packed up and ready to leave? 



      The 2 shilling coin in the photograph is the same coin that I used to create the seal. A fellow over on Free Republic made two very nice animations illustrating this. In his first animation, he uses the first photograph I posted here.

      In his second animation he uses the image that was released by Dr. Taitz.

      You really should pay closer attention to the first photograph I posted here. Many seem to think it's the one that was released by Dr. Taitz. It is not. It is the jpeg version of the tiff file that was downloaded from my camera. It is 2048 x 1536 pixels and was saved with the least amount of jpeg compression. The best photograph released by Dr. Taitz is only 1024 x 768 pixels and is horribly compressed.

      Indeed the first photograph I posted is perhaps the most important of the four. Nothing released by Dr. Taitz is of such high resolution and quality.

      • I’m a Canadian but the bottom line is those that blindly accept Barack Obama’s word that he was born in Hawaii rather than find his behaviour terribly suspicious in legally blocking out all documents [birth certificate, passport(s), post-secondary records (including student loan records), etc] that can easily prove his identity; Obama supporters have the same sort of mindset as those people who have been suckers in scams!

        The so-called ‘investors’ that were so blinded to Bernard Madoff’s charm and reputation, put ALL their money with him! A normal investor (including myself) diversifies and is very sceptical of even so-called ‘Blue Chip’ companies because many of these companies’ books have been audited in collusion with very prestigious accounting firms that have helped ‘cook the books’! I don’t take on face value what is printed on any company’s glossy printed annual statements, I invest for the long run but I can only do so by moving my investment dollars around and not sitting on a few companies for years on end. The suckers involved in the Madoff  Ponzi scheme invested ALL their money with him based on trust!

        The same goes for all these people who ‘on trust’ believe Barack Obama by his word. This group of people all think alike, they have such blind loyalty to this man that even among the normal warning signs (i.e. legally blocking all person documents that can easily clear up his identity) that most people would clue in to, these Obama groupies refuse to see these warning signs! It’s the same mindset as being a member of a cult, where non-cult members can easily spot the bizarre behaviour of ‘the leader’; cult members become blinded to a fault. Cult members will even lash out at non-cult members and make justifications for all the criticism being aimed at their leader!

        That’s what I find disturbing, Obama groupies all are of a similar mindset, just as those who get suckered into money scams all have similar behavioural traits and cult member are conditioned to think alike; those who favour Obama blindly without questioning (the red flag warning areas such as why Obama is going to such lengths to legally block his identity) him are unfortunately gullible to a fault! And to go to such lengths as to make sport of those who have a healthy scepticism of Obama is downright frightening!

        And that’s my point! Finally, let me make an analogy between people like me and Obama groupies; let’s say we’re playing high stakes poker with Obama. It’s the final hand, everyone is all in and we all show our cards. Then Obama says that his hand beats everyone and he begins to claim the pot. People like you would believe him and you would allow him to take all your money, while people like me would demand that Obama show his hand first! You people have allowed Obama to literally take the ultimate pot, which is to become President of the United States by taking his word. To people such as myself (and I’m glad I’m not an American because of this situation), I see that Obama is literally not showing his hand (his cards are represented by all these personal documents through his lifetime which anyone of them could prove his identity) and I see him bluffing.

        You’re being suckered by a con man! 

  17. Wake up OBOT DRONES!  This is not as the MSM would have you believe an incited mob.  This is real Americans wising up to the DEMOCONS plans.  Stay in denial at your own risk but people like this all over the country are not going to tolerate the tyranny of this administration and it stops in 2010.  Take a long hard look at these people and know that you are watching the former silent majority and it's about to throw some bums out on their ear.  Just keep it up punks and rue the day! 


    AARP Town Hall Meeting on Health Care - Dallas, August 4, 2009

  18. Usurpers Birth

    In 1961, the Public Health Services, U. S Department of Health, Education and Welfare, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Division published the “Vital Statistics of the United States — Volume I — Nativity.”

    Now, here comes the good stuff. Page 231 contains the requirements for “Race and color.”

    “Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian (combined), and “other nonwhite.”

    Do you see a classification for “African?” I certainly don’t.

    (copy of a Certificate of Live Birth from Hawaii

    at that time they did not use the word African for race of the father.)

    Now, let’s look at the document that Obama has provided for certifying his eligibility for the Office of the President of the United States and that is displayed on Annenberg

    FATHER’S RACE is “African” — an incorrect entry for that data field. Just a typo? I don’t think so. The Obot who created the bogus Certification of Live Birth just couldn’t type the word “Negro.” Negro is just not politically correct, don’tcha know.

    • psst - he won. i know your neo-con, supposedly,  ex-DEMONCRAT of 56 yrs (right) ass is upset that the john and sarah show didn't get picked up for a four year run, but tough titties. i swear, i have never seen such a pack of whiney sore losers that weren't on a kindergarten playground. fucking grow up and start dealing with the fact he won. no 'do-overs', no 'tag-backs' and no cutting in line. careful or ACORN will ship you off to an old folks death camp. 


      cripes, the wingnut grip on reality gets weaker every day.

      • I love how out of touch you are! It's awesome!!!  Wait, who were the whiney sore losers for 8 years under Bush?  LOLOLOL  Get a mirror, bozo. I predict you have decades of shit coming your way!!!!!  Yahoooo!!!! I wish I could be there to watch you get screwed!!!!!!!  Yay!!!!
  19. There is one MAJOR problem with this alleged forgery.

    There is a stain over the word "Maiden" in the Mother section of the form in the first image. On the second image it isn't there. Now that's no big deal, but the revealed word under the stain isn't "Maiden". It's "Maieen". Either the forger added the stain to the document because of his typo, or he photoshopped the stain out of the document, and didn't think about copying in the correct letter.  

    This could too easily be someone who owned the same rug or quilt and figured he could claim responsibility for the document. 

    • Um, no. The stain is definitely there in both images.
      • Let me clarify. There is something in the first image that is covering the word Maiden. There is also a stain above the word maiden. I am talking about the "stuff" covering the word Maiden. It is there in the first image, but not in the image with the typewriter. The stain is in both images. 

        But the word revealed under the "stuff" doesn't actually say "Maiden". It says "Maieen". Definitely "shopped".   

        • No, not "shopped." All the other creases, dirt smudges, and staple holes match. Just the flake of mud or whatever it is (likely placed there when the hoaxer noticed the typo after the fact) is gone in the typewriter picture. Likelier culprit? Gravity.

          1 comments not shown ([view all])


      It's not a stain. It's a piece of tobacco. I unforunately discovered the typographical error after everything else had been done. Because it was next to the fold I thought I would add a litle authenticity so I moistened the tobacco, folded the top of the page over and pressed on it to create the corresponding brown coloured stain above the fold. Because the piece of tobacco wasn't adhered to the page, it fell off when I picked up the document after photographing it. 

      • Thank you by the way. You are a loser and you actually made more people take a look ak the issue and thats exactly what we want. Educated people will figure out that Obama has hid and protected every signle document about him !

        So thanks, you loser, for helping our cause and you also may get arrested. Wouldn't that be funny. I forwarded your wonderful work to the FBI !!!


          Nobody took a look at the issue who hadn't seen the issue before. The Birther movement was already widely known and sides had already been chosen. Nothing has changed. The Birthers have only gone through yet another cycle of getting their hopes up only to have them dashed upon the rocks and the anti-Birthers have had yet another opportunity to laugh at them. That's all. Nothing has changed.

        • Forwarding this to the FBI would be useful if they were in the business of investigating practical jokes. They do not. Hope this helps.
        • Christ, what an incredibly stupid country.
  20. Hahahahahaha Brilliant! The birthers have been pwnt once again. I daresay they've even been teabagged.

    But it's not suprising since most of the contentions are based on lies anyway.

    • ugly Janean Garofolo, is that you? LOLOLOL  stupid moron. You are so short sighted I bet you can't see the huge pit you're just feet away from stepping into.  That'd be AWESOME to watch!! 


    • Janean Garofolo, is that you? LOLOLOL